This morning the United States Army said that the suspect in the mass murder at Fort Hood shouted “Allahu Akbar!” before shooting. Of course, yesterday the Army said that Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan was dead, but now says he’s not quite, so perhaps the Army’s grasp of the facts is not yet firm. Still, let’s say that it’s true, what does it mean?
It means that Nidal Malik Hasan was Muslim, and that’s all it means. A psychiatrist, he was obviously mentally ill, for one does not engage in acts of mass murder being of sound mind. Psychiatrists are not exempt from the diseases they treat. Mentally ill people are often religiously obsessed, (Richard Dawkins would say that by definition religious people are mentally ill, but he’s mad as a hatter) and often equate the voices in their heads with God (or devils) telling them to commit some heinous act.
This does not mean that every Muslim American or Muslim immigrant is a potential mass murderer, any more than every Roman Catholic is potential child molester or every evangelical is a potential “abortion doctor” murderer.
What is most troubling about this incident is not Hasan’s religion, nor the fact that Hasan’s mental illness went undetected or excused. What is most troubling is that it is one more piece of evidence that the “fight them over there so we won’t have to fight them here” war has been an abject failure. We lost that war. We lost it because we did not understand that one cannot fight ideas with guns. While we were busy doing the Imperial heavy lifting of changing regimes, young people in this country and around the world were being seduced by the idea that it was America who was the oppressor, America who was the terrorist nation, America who was the greatest threat to the future of the human race. One cannot disprove or dislodge those ideas by launching wars in distant deserts against people who all share the same religion. For all you will do is prove their arguments to be true.
5 thoughts on “Allahu Akbar!”
What is most troubling is that it is one more piece of evidence that the “fight them over there so we won't have to fight them here” war has been an abject failure. We lost that war. We lost it because we did not understand that one cannot fight ideas with guns.
This is something I've never heard before regarding this particular shooting. I've always heard that “fight them there so we don't fight them here” line used regarding Iraq and Afghanistan, but never thought about how this shooting shot that argument down (no pun intended). Interesting point. I can't say that I disagree with it.
Where 'over there'? 'Other' cultural territory is pretty big. If we militarily push them in one place they just move to another, and move back in when we leave. The only way we can win, if you will, is to change perception. If they perceive our culture as both more desirable and achievable then we will see a decrease in terrorist attacks. If people don't want our culture, it's easy to attack and destroy. If they have no hope of achieving it, then destructive envy kicks in.
Anthony, always a delight to hear from you! (I'm waiting for your campaign announcement, btw. An independent might be just what we need in several key SC races.) And Karen, you are exactly right, but the tragedy of imperial hubris is its inability to value other cultures, all the while voraciously consuming their resources.
buying viagra online in britain buy online viagra viva viagra song viagra cheap buy online viagra stories how does viagra work buying viagra online viagra rrp australia cost viagra online uk instructions for viagra use viagra or cealis how to get viagra marijuana and viagra cost of viagra
[url=http://community.bsu.edu/members/buy+online+Viagra.aspx]where can i buy Viagra no prescription[/url]